Retention |
Standardized Test Scores |
Anonymous Student Course Evaluations
1. RETENTION
A national survey of 427 institutions showed that the average retention from
first-year to second-year chemistry courses was just 29.8%. The trial sites
participating in this new curriculum have begun with retention statistics well
above national norms. Still, statistics at these sites (that already have a
superior retention record) show that a student is even more likely to remain in
the sequence of chemistry courses under the new curriculum than under the old
curriculum. We also note that specific programmatic issues (e.g., the number
of students whose majors require just one year of chemistry) are likely to cause
a baseline attrition rate that will not be subject to improvement.
All trial sites showed improved retention at every stage of the new curriculum.
The semesters at which the relative gains compared to the traditional curriculum
varied the most differed from site to site. We suppose that this may be due to
programmatic issues, but further data must be collected to test that hypothesis.
The Percentage of Students Retained, measured from day one = 100%
(IWU Data Only)
2. STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES
The Effect Of The Integrated Chemistry Curriculum On MCAT Scores
A Preliminary ReportWe have had only one cycle of integrated chemistry students (22
in all) take the Medical Colleges Admissions Test (MCAT). We compared
the average scores of this group to a similar group of students
who had the traditional chemistry curriculum and who took the
MCAT in the previous year and a half. The results are given as
the average score of all students in each group. The averages
are reported in the three categories provided by MCAT: Verbal,
Physical Science, and Life Science.
Average MCAT Scores For Students Using Either
The Traditional
Or The Integrated Chemistry Curriculum
Thus, when separated into two groups based upon
the students' chemistry curriculum, both groups had nearly identical
verbal ability (exact same raw score, within 0.5 percentile due
to normative statistics used in different versions of the MCAT).
We interpret this to mean the two groups are of nearly identical
average intellectual ability. The two groups differed by 0.65
raw score, or
6.6 percentile in physical sciences (which
includes general chemistry topics). The integrated chemistry group
had the higher score. The two groups differed by 0.44 raw score,
or
8.1 percentile in biological sciences (which includes
organic chemistry topics). The integrated chemistry group had
the higher score.
A Quick Note About the Statistical Approach, Benchmarks Used:
The meaning of the MCAT raw scores changes somewhat from test
to test. The midpoint of the indicated range was used to interpolate
between scores.
The 1999 MCAT had physical 9 = 59.8-72.0, 65.9 midpoint; physical
10 = 72.1-84.3, 78.2 midpoint; biological 9 = 46.9-65.2, 56.0
midpoint; biological 10 = 65.3-82.7, 74.0 midpoint.
The 2000 MCAT had physical 9 = 56.3-70.5, 63.4 midrange; physical
10 = 70.6-83.3, 77.0 midrange; biological 10 = 66.0-84.0, 75.0
midpoint; biological 11 = 83.4-91.5, 87.4 midrange.
3. ANONYMOUS STUDENT COURSE EVALUATIONS
Students were asked a variety of objective and subjective questions concerning their
chemistry course. At IWU, these questions were asked of students in both the old
curriculum and the new curriculum.
The results at IWU showed that students were more likely to report an increased
interest in chemistry after taking the new curriculum. Student evaluations of the
new curriculum reported a higher perception of textbook usefulness than did student
evaluations of the old curriculum, when a nationally renown general chemistry text
was used. When asked how they would respond to a friend asking if he or she should
take the traditional segregated approach or the experimental integrated approach,
students recommended the integrated approach in a two-to-one ratio, both at IWU and
at a trial site that used a similar questionnaire.
Interest in Chemistry (from IWU Student Evaluations)