Course-Embedded Outcomes Assessments
Using The Wall Street Journal:
An Evaluation Rubric and Follow-up
Survey
Michael J. Krause
Associate Professor of Accounting
Le Moyne College
1419 Salt Springs Road
Syracuse, NY 13214-1399
315-445-4426
INTRODUCTION
In this post-Enron era and its aftermath, employers
value accounting graduates who possess skills beyond necessary technical
accounting proficiency. Even as the
body of accounting knowledge grows, important skills such as critical thinking,
writing, ethical awareness and, potentially, teamwork can be developed through
a structured project that utilizes the insights into accounting practice
generated regularly by independent knowledge repositories such as The Wall Street Journal. Once in place, a Wall Street Journal or similar project
provides the instructor an efficient means to witness, monitor and document
student progress in developing skill-related learning outcomes. Additionally,
the grading process provides the instructor an opportunity to learn about
challenges facing accounting practitioners especially in this time of
heightened ethical awareness and expansion of professional services.
RELEVANT PRIOR
RESEARCH
John M. Friedlan (1995) provides foundational
justification for a project that utilizes professional source material such as The Wall Street Journal. Friedlan postulates that students select
career paths based upon perceived stereotypes.
At both the start and end of an introductory financial accounting course
two different groups of students took the same survey dealing with skills and
abilities needed by them in their accounting courses and needed by practicing
accountants in the work place. The
groups differed based upon instructor’s teaching approach. One group relied upon “prescriptive
mini-cases” for class discussions and homework assignments. The other group experienced the traditional
lecture format. Unlike the lecture approach group, the mini-case group found in
its syllabus the following course objectives, which appear relevant to a Wall Street Journal-like project:
1. “To
understand the purposes of accounting information in the economy.”
2. “To
develop writing and oral communication skills.”
The survey found that the mini-case group at the end
of the year attached to accounting practice a greater importance to skills as
listed in the above two points.
Friedlan infers that “accounting courses are vehicles for communicating
information about the nature of the accounting profession”.
Ashbaugh and Johnstone (2000) also shared their
experience with using cases in Intermediate Financial Accounting. In their teaching notes the authors
acknowledge the time pressures instructors face when designing curriculum. As a solution to the challenge of balancing
technical knowledge vs. professional skill development course objectives,
Ashbaugh and Johnstone write “one strategy to resolve this dilemma is to
develop course requirements that simultaneously require students to explore
existing and emerging financial accounting issues while practicing their
professional skills”. The Wall Street Journal is an excellent
place to “explore existing and emerging financial accounting issues” while
practicing specifically writing and critical thinking skills. The teaching note also includes an excellent
rubric for evaluating the written assignment.
When developing an assessment strategy that distinctly addresses a
course project’s objectives, a well-developed rubric serves as a critical
linchpin.
Elliott and Jacobsen (2002) wrote a commentary in
which they identified four economic paradigms.
They explained that we are now leaving the third paradigm “Industry” and
entering into the fourth one “Information Economy.” While the accountant served as the “information professional” for
the “Industry” paradigm, the “Information Economy” paradigm calls for “the new
information professional.” The authors
challenged academics to “play a great role in the accounting profession’s
coming evolution.” Specifically
academics “can define a body of knowledge more suited to the realities of the
marketplace, to the needs of decision makers, and to the future prospects of
both”. They caution academic or
practicing professionals to “adapt accountancy’s body of knowledge to the
modern information economy, or accounting’s place in it will decline.” Without an appreciation for current events
detailed by an agent like The Wall Street
Journal, can today’s students be prepared to answer Elliott and Jacobsen’s
significant challenge?
Scofield and Combes (1993) stress the importance of
establishing the motivation for a writing assignment and refer to the AICPA and
its Education Requirements for Entry into
the Accounting Profession. They
further suggest using a checklist for grading.
Similarly, Stocks, Stoddard and Waters (1992) emphasize that students
need to know the purpose behind a writing assignment and suggest, “good
teachers are not known for the busywork they assign.” They warn against the fallacy that effective writing assignments
are limited to some sort of major research paper and suggest that students
could write articles for college newspapers.
In addition Stocks et al contend that short written assignments do not
have to be graded at all, merely “recorded on a completion basis.”
SEMESTER
PROJECT USING THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
1. You are
to form teams of two.
2. Beginning
the week of January XX, 20XX you are to read The Wall Street Journal.
3. The
spring semester project will last 8 weeks.
Project ends March XX, 20XX.
4. You are
to select three or four articles per week (a minimum of 24 and a maximum of
32). You are to
write
what you learned from the article in relationship to what you are learning in
this Financial
Accounting course. Only a few
sentences necessary to document what you have learned.
5. In your
report, consecutively number articles starting with "1" and ending
with “24“(maximum “32”).
6. Project
will conclude with a SUMMARY (not to exceed two pages in length) that reports
what you
learned
about the accounting profession this semester from reading The Wall Street Journal. Also
explain
why you chose the articles that you did when many others were available. (Submit two versions
of your
summary. The first draft and a second
shorter final version where you edited poor sentences and
inconsequential thoughts. Please
indicate changes made to the first draft.)
7. You are to select articles dealing with the
following topics:
a.)
SEC, government entity that regulates corporate securities sold in public
markets.
b.)
FASB, private regulatory body that establishes accounting rules for USA.
c.)
National CPA firms (Ernst & Young; KPMG; PricewaterhouseCoopers; and
Deloitte).
Other CPA firms are not likely to get press attention.
d.) If
you are unable to find articles for a week from items "a", “b"
or "c" above, then you may use
articles dealing with any type of government regulation.
8. The
project will be graded on a pass / fail basis.
However the top three teams per section will have their
final
grade improved to the next highest letter grade (for example a “C+” would
become a “B-“). Sorry
this
offer not available to those who would get a final grade of "A" due
to the project.
9. Project must be submitted ON OR BEFORE APRIL XX,
20XX.
EVALUATION
RUBRIC
|
1. Project contained 24 - 32 articles over an
eight week period………………….…1
2 |
|
2. Articles numbered consecutively per project
instructions……….......................... 2 |
|
3. Article summaries – quality of content and
writing style……...............................1 2 3 |
|
4. Writing quality in overall
summary………………………………………………1
2 3 |
|
5. Substance of insights found in overall
summary…………………………….……1 2 3 |
|
6. Originality of insights found in overall
summary….….………………….…..…...1
2 3 |
|
7. Overall summary rewrite included per project
instructions………………….….…. 2 |
|
8. Overall summary rewrite demonstrated
improvement in presentation
style……....1 2 |
|
TOTAL
SCORE (Max. 20 points)
____________ |
MEASUREMENTS
TAKEN
For the Spring 2006 semester, a total of 668
articles analyzed from 25 projects submitted.
Articles classified using four “categories” and four “topics” as
follows:
|
Categories: Topics: |
|
A = SEC
E
= Ethics |
|
B =
FASB / PCAOB F =
Proposals / Rulings |
|
C = CPA
firms G =
Enforcements / Lawsuits |
|
D =
Other regulators H =
Other Areas |
|
(Therefore classification “AF” = SEC proposals /
rulings) |
Students participated in an open-ended survey during
the class immediately following project submission. The survey’s only question asked “Based upon what you learned
over the past fifteen (15) weeks as a result of working on the “Wall Street Journal Project”, list three
skills or values that you consider to be very important in order
to be an effective practicing accountant”.
(Study made at the end of the second of a two-course Intermediate
Accounting sequence. Fall 2005 semester
students read The Wall Street Journal
for seven weeks. As a result students
purchase a fifteen week subscription and used it over two semesters.)
OBSERVATIONS
For 25 projects submitted, median rubric score was
16 (mean 15.92, std. dev. 1.96). One
project got perfect score of 20. The
most observed category was (A) the SEC (see table 1). The most observed topic was (G) Enforcements / Lawsuits (see
table 2). The classification used the
most was (AF) SEC Proposals / Rulings (see table 3). In the follow-up survey the necessary skill or value selected the
most by students was Ethics (Honesty) closely followed by keeping up to date
with current events and standard practices (see table 4).
CONCLUSIONS
39% of
students surveyed identified ethics (honesty) as an important value to have in
order to be an effective practicing accountant. This response consistent with
finding that nearly 47% of The Wall
Street Journal articles classified dealt with lawsuits or other
enforcements. 37% of students surveyed
also identified the need to keep up with (1) current events and (2) standard
practices (GAAP) as important skills for practicing accountants. These two responses conform to the fact that
“AF” (SEC proposals and rulings) was the most used classification (nearly 23%
of the study). Despite only indirect
mention within the list of project norms, communications skills chosen by
nearly 24% of students surveyed.
The Wall Street Journal project thus reflects themes in established
literature: (Ashbaugh and Johnstone 2000) an awareness of current emerging
issues (such as ethical ones); (Stocks et. al. 1992) students learned the
purpose of the writing assignment by identifying the importance of
communication skills; and (Elliott and Jacobsen 2002) students expressed an
understanding of the importance of staying current with the profession by
understanding the realities of the marketplace and (Scofield and Combes 1993)
educational requirements for entry into the profession. As a result Wall Street Journal project successfully gave students a window to
a laudatory stereotype of accounting practice (Friedlan 1995). The grading
rubric alone was not sufficient to draw these conclusions. But a rubric in conjunction with a follow-up
survey provided the necessary data combination to obtaining insights into the
extent of student comprehension of the importance and relevance of skills
promoted by the assigned project.
REFERENCES
Ashbaugh, H., and K.M. Johnstone. 2000. Developing Students’ Technical Knowledge and
Professional
Skills: A Sequence of Short
Cases in Intermediate Accounting. Issues in Accounting Education 15
(1): 67 – 88.
Elliott, R.K., and P.D. Jacobson. 2002. The
Evolution of the Knowledge Professional.
Accounting
Horizons 16 (1): 69
– 80.
Friedlan, J.M. 1995. The Effects of Different Teaching Approaches on Students’
Perceptions of the Skills
Needed for Success in Accounting Courses and by Practicing
Accountants. Issues in Accounting
Education
10 (1): 47 – 64.
Scofield, B.W., and L. Combes. 1993. Designing and
Managing Meaningful Writing Assignments. Issues
in Accounting Education 8 (1): 71 – 85.
Stocks, K.D., T.D. Stoddard, and M.L. Waters.
1992. Writing in the Accounting
Curriculum: Guidelines
for
Professors. Issues in Accounting Education 7 (2): 193 – 204.
Table 1 –
Categories Describing 668 Articles Analyzed
|
Category Description |
Category Label |
Total Articles Observed - % |
|
SEC |
(A) |
48.20% |
|
Other Regulators |
(D) |
31.74% |
|
CPA Firms |
(C) |
10.48% |
|
FASB / PCAOB |
(B) |
9.58% |
Table 2 –
Topics Describing 668 Articles Analyzed
|
Topic Description |
Topic Label |
Total Articles Observed - % |
|
Enforcements / Lawsuits |
(G) |
46.71% |
|
Proposals / Rulings |
(F) |
33.23% |
|
Other Areas |
(H) |
16.02% |
|
Ethics |
(E) |
4.04% |
Table 3 – In
Analyzing 668 Articles, Classifications made using Categories and Topics Listed
above
|
Classification Description |
Classification Label |
Total Articles Observed - % |
|
SEC Proposals/Rulings |
AF |
22.75% |
|
SEC Enforcements/Lawsuits |
AG |
20.81% |
|
Other Regulators -Enforcements/Lawsuits |
DG |
15.72% |
|
Other Regulators Other Areas |
DH |
10.78% |
|
CPA Firms -Enforcements/Lawsuits |
CG |
7.04% |
|
Various (9 other combinations) |
various |
22.90% |
Table 4
–Follow-up Open-ended Survey Results – 38 Students Providing a Total of 114
Responses
|
Skill or Value Identified |
Number of Responses Made |
Students - % |
|
Ethics (Honesty) |
15 responses |
39.47% |
|
Keeping up to date (current events) |
14 responses |
36.84% |
|
Standard Practices (GAAP) |
14 responses |
36.84% |
|
Communications Skills (Writing) |
9 responses |
23.68% |